Thursday, May 20, 2010

Seal Hole Surgeonxmas App

iura novit curia principle

AGAINST NOVITA CURIA IURA

WE ARE ALL THE SCJ



No, we're so great, nor do we know so much, and we went on TV with the Constitution in hand after breakfast. Neither the Court decided (for now) to continue the position of Angela Ledesma on iura novit curia. The title has to do with the proposal that we at the end of the post.
Below you will find fragments of an extraordinary appeal presented by a case of the pilot. While we cut him some arguments, the position still remains unclear.
What drove this part of the appeal was the court's imposition of a penalty greater than that sought by the prosecution. While not specifically talk about the matching principle, we insist on the guarantees that are affected when it is violated, whether the facts in the legal (remember the impossibility of separating sharply facts and law) or even in the amount of penalty to impose.

Here goes:


Untitled


Our proposal is this: if they were judges of the Supreme Court will reach a resource of this kind, and fail (no ironing a 280)? Matias

course - Javier Cassani

0 comments:

Post a Comment